I'm always excited to take on new projects and collaborate with innovative minds.

Social Links

Project

UX Case Study :: Rapid Pass BD vs Metro BD

Designing Transit Experiences for Clarity, Confidence, and Scale

Client

Case Study

Start Date

Dec 01, 2025
UX Case Study :: Rapid Pass BD vs Metro BD

Introduction: Designing for High-Pressure Transit Environments

Public transportation systems operate in one of the most demanding UX environments. Users interact with products while standing, walking, boarding vehicles, navigating crowds, and making time-sensitive decisions. Unlike typical consumer apps, failure in transit UX has immediate consequences—missed trains, delays, confusion, and loss of trust.

This case study presents a comparative UX analysis between Rapid Pass BD, a live public transit payment system currently used in Bangladesh, and Metro BD, a conceptual UX project designed to explore an ideal, commuter-first metro rail experience.

The purpose of this comparison is not to position one as “better” than the other, but to demonstrate how design intent, system constraints, and prioritization shape user experience outcomes. By comparing a production-grade, infrastructure-led system with a future-facing, experience-led concept, this case study highlights critical UX decisions that impact clarity, confidence, and usability in real-world transit environments.


What This Case Study Demonstrates

This case study showcases:

  • End-to-end UX thinking, from problem framing to interaction design
  • Trade-offs between system-driven and user-centered design
  • Mobile-first UX decisions in high-movement, high-pressure contexts
  • Accessibility-aware information architecture
  • Translation of complex transit systems into task-oriented experiences
  • Product thinking applicable to real-world public infrastructure

Project Context

Rapid Pass BD (Live System)

Rapid Pass BD is a nationwide public transit payment platform designed to support fare collection across multiple transportation modes. As a live public system, it must balance usability with operational stability, regulatory compliance, and infrastructure scalability.

fdgfgf.png


Primary objectives

  • Enable secure, reliable fare payments
  • Support phased infrastructure rollout
  • Ensure system uptime and transaction accuracy
  • Align with public policy and operational constraints

UX implication
Because Rapid Pass BD is tightly coupled with physical infrastructure and public operations, UX improvements must be incremental and low-risk. As a result, the experience centers on payments, balances, and account management rather than end-to-end journey support.


Metro BD (Concept Project)

Metro BD is a conceptual UX project created to explore what a modern metro experience could look like if designed from the commuter’s perspective first.

frame-1000002608.png

Primary objectives

  • Reduce uncertainty during travel
  • Improve journey predictability
  • Provide real-time, contextual information
  • Minimize cognitive load in transit environments

UX implication
Freed from legacy systems and policy constraints, Metro BD serves as a design exploration for future-ready transit UX patterns, focusing on clarity, guidance, and confidence throughout the journey lifecycle.


Design Problem

How might we design mobile transit experiences that allow users to complete journeys with clarity, confidence, and minimal effort—especially in time-sensitive, high-movement environments?

Key contextual challenges

  • Users interact while walking, standing, or boarding
  • Decisions must be made quickly
  • Errors result in immediate friction or delays
  • Network connectivity may be inconsistent
  • Users vary widely in digital literacy and accessibility needs

UX Strategy: Commuter Mental Models

Effective transit UX must align with commuter mental models, not system architecture.

Observed commuter intent

  • Where am I going?
  • How do I get there?
  • How much will it cost?
  • When should I move?
  • Am I on the right path?

This intent framework becomes the foundation for comparing Rapid Pass BD and Metro BD.


Core UX Comparison

Onboarding and First-Time Experience

Rapid Pass BD

  • Standard login and authentication flow
  • Initial exposure focuses on card balance and transactions
  • Limited contextual guidance for first-time users

UX impact
The experience assumes prior familiarity and requires users to mentally bridge payments and journeys, increasing early cognitive load.

Metro BD

  • OTP-based, low-friction authentication
  • Introduces journey planning and fare visibility early
  • Establishes user intent from the first screen

UX insight
In transit systems, onboarding should establish purpose before functionality. Commuters care less about stored value and more about how the system helps them reach a destination.


Information Architecture

Rapid Pass BD

  • Feature-centric navigation
  • Structure mirrors backend systems (cards, balance, recharge)
  • Journeys are implicit rather than explicit

Metro BD

  • Task-centric navigation:
    • Plan journey
    • View fare
    • Track arrivals
    • Travel history and recharge

Design rationale
Metro BD mirrors natural commuter workflows:
Search → Decide → Pay → Travel → Confirm
This alignment reduces the need for users to translate between digital interfaces and physical transit environments.


Fare Experience

Rapid Pass BD

  • Balance-first interaction model
  • Fare visibility is secondary
  • Users infer affordability rather than being informed

Metro BD

  • Fare displayed per route and destination
  • Cost clarity before payment or movement
  • Supports informed travel decisions

UX impact
Transparent pricing reduces anxiety, improves trust, and enables better route and timing choices.


Real-Time Decision Support

Rapid Pass BD

  • Limited real-time information
  • Focus on transaction history
  • Users rely on external sources for arrival updates

Metro BD

  • Real-time arrival indicators
  • Movement-aware prompts
  • Contextual wayfinding and guidance

UX insight
In transit, real-time relevance outweighs historical accuracy. Users value knowing what to do next more than reviewing what already happened.


User Flow Capability Comparison

CapabilityRapid Pass BDMetro BD
Journey planningNoYes
Fare estimationNoYes
RechargeYesYes
Real-time updatesNoYes
End-to-end journey flowNoYes

Accessibility and Inclusivity Considerations

Rapid Pass BD

  • Functional but text-heavy
  • Requires familiarity with system terminology
  • Limited contextual assistance

Metro BD

  • Clear visual hierarchy
  • Glanceable UI for quick comprehension
  • Predictive guidance reduces reading and decision load

Accessibility insight
Effective transit UX minimizes the need to stop, read extensively, or interpret complex information under pressure.


UX Metrics and Experience Indicators

MetricRapid Pass BDMetro BD
Ease of onboardingMediumHigh
Real-time decision supportLowHigh
Task completion effortMediumLow
Accessibility readinessNeeds improvementIntegrated

Key Experience Areas

Rapid Pass BD

  • Card dashboard
  • Recharge workflows
  • Balance and transaction history

The experience is reliable and stable but places a higher cognitive burden on users to map payments to journeys.

Metro BD

  • Source-to-destination planning
  • Upfront fare visibility
  • Live arrival tracking
  • Station and route guidance

The system actively supports users throughout the entire journey lifecycle.


UX Challenges and Insights

Rapid Pass BD

Challenges

  • UX constrained by infrastructure and policy
  • Payments prioritized over journeys
  • Limited real-time feedback

Insight
Live public systems must balance UX improvement with operational risk, resulting in gradual experience evolution.


Metro BD

Strengths

  • Experience-led design decisions
  • Predictive, contextual support
  • Reduced uncertainty during travel

Insight
Concept projects are essential for exploring UX directions that can later inform production systems.


Design Approach and Execution

UX thinking

  • Framing problems from commuter context
  • Designing for stress, motion, and urgency
  • Treating cognitive load as a primary metric

Execution strategy

  • Task-based interaction models
  • Real-time feedback loops
  • Mobile-first, glanceable UI patterns

Collaboration mindset

  • Balancing ideal UX with real-world feasibility
  • Producing handoff-ready design artifacts

Deliverables

  • User flows
  • Wireframes and prototypes
  • Interaction models
  • Responsive UI systems

UX Outcomes

For users

  • Reduced friction during travel
  • Clear cost and journey expectations
  • Increased confidence and predictability

For product teams

  • Clear articulation of commuter needs
  • Identification of actionable UX gaps
  • Experience-led concepts grounded in feasibility

Final Reflection

This comparison highlights a fundamental distinction:

Building transit infrastructure is not the same as designing transit experiences.

Rapid Pass BD reflects the realities of deploying large-scale public systems where stability and policy alignment are critical. Metro BD demonstrates how intentional UX design can transform commuting into a predictable, accessible, and confidence-driven experience.

Both perspectives are necessary.
User-led design is what ultimately defines meaningful public services.


Skills and Tools
UX Analysis · Information Architecture · Interaction Design · Accessibility · Mobile UX · Product Thinking · Figma

 

Share

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies. Cookie Policy