I'm always excited to take on new projects and collaborate with innovative minds.
Designing Transit Experiences for Clarity, Confidence, and Scale
Public transportation systems operate in one of the most demanding UX environments. Users interact with products while standing, walking, boarding vehicles, navigating crowds, and making time-sensitive decisions. Unlike typical consumer apps, failure in transit UX has immediate consequences—missed trains, delays, confusion, and loss of trust.
This case study presents a comparative UX analysis between Rapid Pass BD, a live public transit payment system currently used in Bangladesh, and Metro BD, a conceptual UX project designed to explore an ideal, commuter-first metro rail experience.
The purpose of this comparison is not to position one as “better” than the other, but to demonstrate how design intent, system constraints, and prioritization shape user experience outcomes. By comparing a production-grade, infrastructure-led system with a future-facing, experience-led concept, this case study highlights critical UX decisions that impact clarity, confidence, and usability in real-world transit environments.
This case study showcases:
Rapid Pass BD is a nationwide public transit payment platform designed to support fare collection across multiple transportation modes. As a live public system, it must balance usability with operational stability, regulatory compliance, and infrastructure scalability.

Primary objectives
UX implication
Because Rapid Pass BD is tightly coupled with physical infrastructure and public operations, UX improvements must be incremental and low-risk. As a result, the experience centers on payments, balances, and account management rather than end-to-end journey support.
Metro BD is a conceptual UX project created to explore what a modern metro experience could look like if designed from the commuter’s perspective first.

Primary objectives
UX implication
Freed from legacy systems and policy constraints, Metro BD serves as a design exploration for future-ready transit UX patterns, focusing on clarity, guidance, and confidence throughout the journey lifecycle.
How might we design mobile transit experiences that allow users to complete journeys with clarity, confidence, and minimal effort—especially in time-sensitive, high-movement environments?
Key contextual challenges
Effective transit UX must align with commuter mental models, not system architecture.
Observed commuter intent
This intent framework becomes the foundation for comparing Rapid Pass BD and Metro BD.
Rapid Pass BD
UX impact
The experience assumes prior familiarity and requires users to mentally bridge payments and journeys, increasing early cognitive load.
Metro BD
UX insight
In transit systems, onboarding should establish purpose before functionality. Commuters care less about stored value and more about how the system helps them reach a destination.
Rapid Pass BD
Metro BD
Design rationale
Metro BD mirrors natural commuter workflows:
Search → Decide → Pay → Travel → Confirm
This alignment reduces the need for users to translate between digital interfaces and physical transit environments.
Rapid Pass BD
Metro BD
UX impact
Transparent pricing reduces anxiety, improves trust, and enables better route and timing choices.
Rapid Pass BD
Metro BD
UX insight
In transit, real-time relevance outweighs historical accuracy. Users value knowing what to do next more than reviewing what already happened.
| Capability | Rapid Pass BD | Metro BD |
|---|---|---|
| Journey planning | No | Yes |
| Fare estimation | No | Yes |
| Recharge | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time updates | No | Yes |
| End-to-end journey flow | No | Yes |
Rapid Pass BD
Metro BD
Accessibility insight
Effective transit UX minimizes the need to stop, read extensively, or interpret complex information under pressure.
| Metric | Rapid Pass BD | Metro BD |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of onboarding | Medium | High |
| Real-time decision support | Low | High |
| Task completion effort | Medium | Low |
| Accessibility readiness | Needs improvement | Integrated |
Rapid Pass BD
The experience is reliable and stable but places a higher cognitive burden on users to map payments to journeys.
Metro BD
The system actively supports users throughout the entire journey lifecycle.
Rapid Pass BD
Challenges
Insight
Live public systems must balance UX improvement with operational risk, resulting in gradual experience evolution.
Metro BD
Strengths
Insight
Concept projects are essential for exploring UX directions that can later inform production systems.
UX thinking
Execution strategy
Collaboration mindset
Deliverables
For users
For product teams
This comparison highlights a fundamental distinction:
Building transit infrastructure is not the same as designing transit experiences.
Rapid Pass BD reflects the realities of deploying large-scale public systems where stability and policy alignment are critical. Metro BD demonstrates how intentional UX design can transform commuting into a predictable, accessible, and confidence-driven experience.
Both perspectives are necessary.
User-led design is what ultimately defines meaningful public services.
Skills and Tools
UX Analysis · Information Architecture · Interaction Design · Accessibility · Mobile UX · Product Thinking · Figma
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *